IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Tue, 27 July 2021 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBACC3A1ECB; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 03:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p8slBXbytLuh; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 03:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prometheus.amsuess.com (prometheus.amsuess.com [5.9.147.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B3E3A1EC9; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 03:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (095129206250.cust.akis.net [95.129.206.250]) by prometheus.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D9F0401B5; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:29:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bf]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583CAD0; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:29:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (178.115.45.57.wireless.dyn.drei.com [178.115.45.57]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9D1A101; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 3011988 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:29:34 -0000
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:29:34 +0200
From: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses.all@ietf.org, IETF IoT Directorate <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, Mohit Sethi <mohit.m.sethi@ericsson.com>, cbor@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YP/gDi/khWPnBnNy@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <162729343263.13734.5774247416866337222@ietfa.amsl.com> <ECE0152F-121F-4EC4-94C3-EC7DB4A115D0@tzi.org> <CALaySJ+Xf0B2EUFJJ3h19BMKZBcTQaiR4uk+LdoaM5MG_+R1-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wh6OvRWgCkg/zSN+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+Xf0B2EUFJJ3h19BMKZBcTQaiR4uk+LdoaM5MG_+R1-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/IIVUBHbUU-VWNUEvHeOUTPmSDdI>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 10:29:43 -0000

> If someone comes to the set of CBOR documents later, with no knowledge
> of what's gone on here, they will see 260/261, and they will see
> 52/54, and they will wonder which to use.

For the general case, there is the rough plan to adopt
bormann-cbor-notable-tags, and to add a link to the living WG document
to the registry's introduction, advertising it as a guide / survey /
commentary of the tag landscape.

(IANA has indicated that this should be possible).

This will take a bit of time to execute (notable-tags will need to be
adopted, and doesn't mention cbor-network-addresses yet), but I think
it'll be managable in the interims until IETF112.

BR
c

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status