IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] [Anima] [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 25 February 2023 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0BC14EB18; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apKvyxEH3XoU; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D821C151539; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PPN2618jBzDCbK; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:17:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9722.1677366130@localhost>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:17:01 +0100
Cc: "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>, cbor@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 699059821.752741-7da165382900491f9b1f0afd2770487d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01524EF4-E35A-409E-AC4A-ABDEC35EFD2C@tzi.org>
References: <FF048123-7AC9-4F6D-8F72-1DD17E40BAF8@tzi.org> <5935.1677359412@localhost> <B36F6970-7C0E-4870-A90B-4ACFABA3A4DA@tzi.org> <EFD0BB5C-96D1-4851-A038-06985D7944DE@tzi.org> <C32C92C3-825F-4320-B7EE-31ACB0066EBD@tzi.org> <9722.1677366130@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/J5pEenDqafX19MtVI5ISY6xkQ9M>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Anima] [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 23:17:12 -0000

On 2023-02-26, at 00:02, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Thank you... but the YANG still went through your brain, not a tool :-)
> So, I'm still concerned that the content might be wrong in some way that
> deceives our brains.

Yep, somebody SHOULD write that tool.
(Hmm, need to find a BYGS [bright young grad student].
But do I trust the tool that comes out more than my brain? :-)

I’m really concerned whether YANG tools out there simply accept the invalid base64, or the `“true”` in the second example that should be a `true`…  It is usually hard to get the soup back into the tin.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status