From nobody Sat Feb 25 15:17:13 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0BC14EB18; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apKvyxEH3XoU; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D821C151539; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:17:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PPN2618jBzDCbK; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:17:02 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <9722.1677366130@localhost> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 00:17:01 +0100 Cc: "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" , cbor@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 699059821.752741-7da165382900491f9b1f0afd2770487d Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <01524EF4-E35A-409E-AC4A-ABDEC35EFD2C@tzi.org> References: <5935.1677359412@localhost> <9722.1677366130@localhost> To: Michael Richardson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Anima] [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid) X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 23:17:12 -0000 On 2023-02-26, at 00:02, Michael Richardson = wrote: >=20 > Thank you... but the YANG still went through your brain, not a tool = :-) > So, I'm still concerned that the content might be wrong in some way = that > deceives our brains. Yep, somebody SHOULD write that tool. (Hmm, need to find a BYGS [bright young grad student]. But do I trust the tool that comes out more than my brain? :-) I=E2=80=99m really concerned whether YANG tools out there simply accept = the invalid base64, or the `=E2=80=9Ctrue=E2=80=9D` in the second = example that should be a `true`=E2=80=A6 It is usually hard to get the = soup back into the tin. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten