Re: [Cbor] STD 94, RFC 8949 on Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 05 December 2020 01:02 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D753A111C for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:02:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzwLR679ocXY for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D600D3A111A for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dca87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.202.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CnrrP73NwzyV2; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 02:01:57 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201205004056.1EA1BF40726@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:01:57 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 628822917.544183-ff91c437f4500060cd38bccc07232e7c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DD5FC97-70B8-4510-9F2F-A26450E850B7@tzi.org>
References: <20201205004056.1EA1BF40726@rfc-editor.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/K61GyYADZJRrrA3L8ywiPIQIOL4>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] STD 94, RFC 8949 on Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 01:02:02 -0000
On 2020-12-05, at 01:40, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > STD 94 > RFC 8949 > > Title: Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Thank you all for all the contributions that made this happen. Grüße, Carsten
- [Cbor] STD 94, RFC 8949 on Concise Binary Object … rfc-editor
- Re: [Cbor] STD 94, RFC 8949 on Concise Binary Obj… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] STD 94, RFC 8949 on Concise Binary Obj… Francesca Palombini