[Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 08 September 2020 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B743A045B; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 23:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, samitac.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.15.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159954801165.22491.8758202978139000058@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 23:53:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/KjVG87ape5HkoSJMA2ZT9R9chzM>
Subject: [Cbor] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-cbor-date-tag-06=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 06:53:32 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Thank you Samita Chakrabarti for your IoT directorate review at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06-iotdir-telechat-chakrabarti-2020-08-31/

Please find below some nits.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

PS: your example in the security considerations applied to my own birthday in
Japan then in Canada ;-) and this was my only international date line crossing.
Good planing of mine ;-)

== NITS ==

-- Section 1 and IANA section --
In the text "The tagged integer is an unsigned or negative value", should it
rather be "The tagged integer is a positive or negative value" ?