Re: [Cbor] Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sun, 30 June 2019 18:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A74120187; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L0DFMAkF7nTI; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 119FF120176; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:42:54 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Barry Leiba' <barryleiba@computer.org>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
References: <156136162522.17502.17006799946775417333.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156136162522.17502.17006799946775417333.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 11:42:53 -0700
Message-ID: <0e9201d52f73$a1f85a50$e5e90ef0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMD07XSb0WNI8+/zCCX7XjtWWv02qRXProg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/M5wZeVzr2wFoxhqIyMvmViapkVs>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 18:43:04 -0000
-----Original Message----- From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 12:34 AM To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc: cbor-chairs@ietf.org; cbor@ietf.org Subject: Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT) Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cbor/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nit: "a mechanism other that" should be "a mechanism other than". "and add to a second edition of the specification if warranted" ... presumably this is in the re-charter because it *is* warranted. I suggest removing "if warranted". [JLS] I would be happy for a re-wording, but the "if warranted" related to individual features and not to the entire process of producing a second version. A better string might be "where warrented" "The body of existing specifications that make use of CDDL is considered precious": Awwwwwwwww... :-) [JLS] Not actionable? "It is currently expected that this would be done using a Wiki of some type. This work would not be expected to be published by the IETF." Yayyyyy! Thanks. Nit: that are either currently adopted by the working group, by other working groups, or as individual submissions" is not a parallel list. Maybe, "that are currently adopted by the working group, are work items in other working groups, or exist as individual submissions." Also, I suggest removing the paragraph break between this paragraph and the next. Nit: "Internet wide specifications" needs a hyphen: "Internet-wide specifications".
- [Cbor] Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor-01-… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [Cbor] Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor… Jim Schaad
- Re: [Cbor] Barry Leiba's Yes on charter-ietf-cbor… Barry Leiba