[Cbor] 7049bis -08 and -09 submitted

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 04 November 2019 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5741209D1 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:35:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AIxP-fcwll0y for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E5D120910 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:35:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from client-0152.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0152.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 476TgP1cqKzydC; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:35:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 594603327.047892-f6ffdf1e6c111621f1a9d58fc31787a0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:35:28 +0100
Message-Id: <AF58A490-9E49-4E20-9044-E9AC2C3B8D4B@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/MTwIzI42vcfxw3evIvIJiCkHCkY>
Subject: [Cbor] 7049bis -08 and -09 submitted
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:35:38 -0000

Right before the I-D deadline, I have submitted two new versions of 7049bis

Version -08:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-08
Contains all the changes that we had done about a week ago, so should be relatively stable.

Version -09:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-09
has all the bleeding edge stuff that has not had as much review.

These were submitted separately so you can look at the changes separately.

Of course, if you want the firehose:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-07&url2=draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-09

It would be great to get some review so we can decide whether -09 is the WGLC version.
(I have done some issue processing, but not yet a grand re-read.
Expect some WGLC comments from me as well ;-)

There are a few remnant issues at:

https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/issues

which I believe can be closed, but before that I'd like to hear some support for closing them.

Grüße, Carsten