IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 31 March 2025 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A840154736D; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q69VVE5RpYdi; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E651547365; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p548dc3ec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.195.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZRH6l5cvbzDCf4; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:45:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <30810339-7B42-43EC-ACB2-2773AAF09944@island-resort.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:45:03 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 765132303.29222-1b09622a8170780cbfbce41147436ab3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2E035B44-348B-415C-8DF4-6DC2BE5F4C42@tzi.org>
References: <Z8oi3HMTum5eriSw@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <ABE85E99-9B1F-4B09-8910-9CEB58DA1240@tzi.org> <30810339-7B42-43EC-ACB2-2773AAF09944@island-resort.com>
To: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Message-ID-Hash: S5EPNA4TKCRZ5KEJTCP3SION4MA3VUJG
X-Message-ID-Hash: S5EPNA4TKCRZ5KEJTCP3SION4MA3VUJG
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-cde@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/N-iqlYzsK82CWVomIsIO6ipDsu8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

On 2025-03-31, at 18:05, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> wrote:
> 
> This is not an issue for me. I just used that name in my draft. Don’t want to fuss about names.

Thank you.

In my experience, names are very important:
They will be used by people who don’t know their detailed meaning, so their thinking will operate on their connotations and not their meaning.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status