Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 28 January 2024 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73066C14F616 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:11:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7M5k8rK0Gl9 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com (mail-ed1-f54.google.com [209.85.208.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9500C14F610 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-55eb1f9d1f0so2249536a12.0 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:11:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706476295; x=1707081095; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=JeFwiToKWoSvWaR48S+2e9y63ZvId3b1kaIxvY0ppak=; b=OSiFAyNYMYvmouGqDjBFFwz2KQ4BlNIj+L0RjK/IugskOoS8BmJ4L25B+q/cPC3dNg KdmGxIBdZGh4ui2gP/8VuquaO9BmhcAdQFSRGdmDIYPR9SlTvrEHNaNIvXFIhgjIakMm X1UiYtlMA6rJxKCGdJ/9dKojg0A29lXaYWPuV1c71uX356vRFGV2nIpUbvNqlIDPzmqi KLYReQE6Z0zGoGNWT+DoHXcXR2KlHCBBKiP0tYZcn6GH8GXj+XUrNk6Dg7fZ48QIkzBd s/L9ym1CxKqytIGoda3ZJRNNPRjXMSqK9CVxQS3UNDdZ6wt4z/UYb/pvLpG4RZGLNFbM 2hmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzjYj0TM2T4ck5056eO/HYMG/H1AWjCo72bbmVMmJGnxt8WEPYd CwUeO1o2TD4GWPFUVFWQ6KrmqpNsMDa06U0d37dvzXAoZzMVrMVCw8ZBKb0h5hZI+jfsZ8v/ZOb tB1pYYU2wchrsgbZGiScD8jf0g1E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHwwlHNJe4/YY8l5sBuuWbFA1zTKsKRkc/o+tfC/qEG1AwFJz3zsWGXppiLz1wFewAFuXeHppx22tNqMYBYdDs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9c92:b0:a35:a65a:d9da with SMTP id fj18-20020a1709069c9200b00a35a65ad9damr1193335ejc.34.1706476294982; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 13:11:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2934ace3-a186-4b32-a1da-68482a61b1bd@gmail.com> <8417DF3D-9319-412B-9C29-CE78339F77D0@island-resort.com> <39a1f0fe-de53-4311-ac65-9b3b1056fc54@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <39a1f0fe-de53-4311-ac65-9b3b1056fc54@gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 16:11:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJKku9xMkqXi_v7NRA0BzbORUZQHHdC4LbWVos8SuDSVyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Cc: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061501d061007f9d7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/NOwNDgeH2P5LkP0cn_OgXpM0sOk>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:11:37 -0000
Anders, > Right, I just repeat my claim that even the dCBOR originators with moderate > amounts of rework, indeed could use CDE. … > my dismissal is only "For the Record" "Rough Consensus" is already at hand. Your dismissal has been recorded; now, please stop repeating. Before you comment, please consider whether you’re saying anything new, and whether what you have to say will truly further the discussion. We all need to accept when we are “in the rough” and assess when it’s time to avoid impeding progress for others. Intelligent, well intentioned people will nevertheless disagree at times; that’s how it goes. > Anyway, since you and Carsten have more or less promised Wolf and > Christopher an IETF standard, No one has promised anything, and no one here can make that promise. Rather, what we have is rough consensus in the working group (not specifically from certain people) to take the dCBOR path. Please avoid making disparaging or dismissive comments about people. You may disagree with someone, but we continue to treat them with respect anyway. Barry, as chair
- [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions lgl island-resort.com
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] Stalled dCBOR discussions Anders Rundgren