[Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit systems
Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com> Sat, 27 April 2019 21:14 UTC
Return-Path: <felipe@felipegasper.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E55F1200DE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=felipegasper.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqTGC_CUP6iN for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web1.siteocity.com (web1.siteocity.com [67.227.147.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C489C12004B for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 14:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=felipegasper.com; s=default; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Yl2jKJMBwrsNoMOrokzd5npGpl9dZxCF2m52b9TNKzU=; b=mnaPKPPwoDvbWS2rPmlJcctYkG jRs8TyTxh+AGfzOreQV5qPVO4MP6AAqfUw3EVregr5+Tp1RMtmRcHZvn8/51o/fJMcCsw6WZwX1sD oDmytPECyOqkl1w9auo7djGFPzDah2kHkZzYmjQcWvtDv8mzhqtEh28OeZpSuRzSBBCzDifEIXIyQ L4dt6sqyeLN8EwzIl1sroIgFmCtQC/HUAvy/FaFxrW2dAR3Cez0IJq5VsiyM5PlZBHezpXOzPRtPY uiJcNGML3WMEMEzsiVJSgV6r/wf2SixeOYbkjutYgl4ypZOW//olN8kTYA/dhyUHcLWaU0C7o0VxQ 9teYKDsw==;
Received: from [149.248.87.38] (port=51674 helo=felipes-mbp.lan) by web1.siteocity.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <felipe@felipegasper.com>) id 1hKUeV-00A4sW-5K for cbor@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:14:31 -0500
From: Felipe Gasper <felipe@felipegasper.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Message-Id: <7F3512DE-A3E2-41F1-A514-EC3F0BF2E3F3@felipegasper.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:14:30 -0400
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web1.siteocity.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - felipegasper.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web1.siteocity.com: authenticated_id: fgasper/from_h
X-Authenticated-Sender: web1.siteocity.com: felipe@felipegasper.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/PZ4Tgkvb2JSHDqYngpKlmVnFulA>
Subject: [Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit systems
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 21:14:34 -0000
Hello, Is there either a custom or a standard that guides interpretation of 64-bit CBOR integers on 32-bit systems that don’t have 64-bit emulation? Thank you! -Felipe Gasper Mississauga, Ontario
- Re: [Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit… Felipe Gasper
- [Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit sys… Felipe Gasper
- Re: [Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Decoding of 64-bit CBOR ints on 32-bit… Carsten Bormann