[Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 17 February 2021 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C343A1CF2 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCs4oHPwbhcf for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFD953A1D58 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:02:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Dgpdz1T0qzyd3; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:02:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 635284934.461992-f16ceec5c99351c276078deac1877e81
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:02:14 +0100
Message-Id: <CA182161-D902-4B9B-9AD7-B3FA20AD47FC@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Pfa60hJmnAYCSXTK3A_dqNyldDM>
Subject: [Cbor] hildjj/cbor-map-entries: Explicit Map datatype for CBOR, in array format
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:03:14 -0000

Do we agree that an order-preserving map occurs often enough to warrant a 1+1 (or even 1+0?) tag?

The current proposal is 1+2.

(Any other comments?)

https://github.com/hildjj/cbor-map-entries 

Grüße, Carsten