[Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 03 July 2019 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109FD1200E7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANdfuRm_1JoJ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A8B120044 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:05:24 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.004; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:05:23 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06
Thread-Index: AQHVMTMCefbI2TDiXkiAZlyaW7V0kg==
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 00:05:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D9257912-E974-4EC2-BF7F-1F130D29BD0B@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EA20687B315109498E63A0ADC950AF20@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/PkzynJJ8Jlf52plqT8vp4pdlWfI>
Subject: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:05:28 -0000

On 2 Jul 2019, at 17:00, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)
>         Authors         : Carsten Bormann
>                           Paul Hoffman
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 64
> 	Date            : 2019-07-02
>
> Abstract:
>    The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format
>    whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small code
>    size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the need
>    for version negotiation.  These design goals make it different from
>    earlier binary serializations such as ASN.1 and MessagePack.
>
>    This document obsoletes RFC 7049.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-06

As you can see from the diffs, this draft makes a *lot* of changes from the -05. We hope y'all carefully review the diffs looking for anything that we have made worse. 

At this point, there are no open pull requests in the repo, but there are still many open issues. We hope to work on those in the coming weeks.

--Paul Hoffman