From nobody Wed Jun  9 02:30:04 2021
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882FE3A1897
 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 02:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id AmzjopUBmzKV for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed,  9 Jun 2021 02:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de
 [134.102.50.19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F683A189A
 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 02:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [84.141.204.137])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G0MJh4d44z2xHV;
 Wed,  9 Jun 2021 11:29:56 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <161530094514.13640.13557132723821236873@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:29:56 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644923796.183351-5af8244a526ee9d1b2c7fa7caaff7eb8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DE9E58FC-13DE-4AD5-B0EC-EBF0DC13153A@tzi.org>
References: <161530094514.13640.13557132723821236873@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/QdqMAN4EAhq7W7BRCuJ-t3nnF4Q>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-02.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:30:03 -0000

I just had occasion to check RFC 8992 (should have done that earlier, =
ouch).

Apart from this nice piece of CDDL, repeated all over the place (yes, =
the rest is missing each time):

     objective-flags /=3D          ; as in the GRASP specification

=E2=80=A6 I find:

     prefval /=3D pref6val
     pref6val =3D [version6, length, ?prefix]
     version6 =3D 6
     length =3D 0..128             ; requested or offered prefix length
     prefix =3D bytes .size 16     ; offered prefix in binary format

     prefval /=3D pref4val
     pref4val =3D [version4, length4, ?prefix4]
     version4 =3D 4
     length4 =3D 0..32             ; requested or offered prefix length
     prefix4 =3D bytes .size 4     ; offered prefix in binary format

Maybe we should supply some CDDL in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses so =
people don=E2=80=99t start to copy the above whenever they need a =
prefix.

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten