IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] [Rats] I-D: draft-rundgren-cote-00

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 21 July 2022 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D28C06B995; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7aNmlzRvR8G; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08744C15A727; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LpM6929xRzDCbp; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 07:47:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <b059426f-9deb-3476-e683-ac7d8e0233e7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 07:47:28 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>, cbor@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A0EAE5D8-A401-4A16-9080-FE10A10F8889@tzi.org>
References: <ce8a6fd8-001e-32bb-2145-03cda63e9366@gmail.com> <Yta3IrJymgGkCj46@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <4B455A6A-76EA-42A5-B70E-F3671C47E25D@tzi.org> <7D9E2594-06E0-47F0-B67D-23602F981FD4@cursive.net> <FDD10E92-AD59-464B-9FD4-4745D95F150A@tzi.org> <0e86ea83-8e16-30b8-e433-1ba9a4b1b0fc@gmail.com> <1663483.1658345550@dooku> <b059426f-9deb-3476-e683-ac7d8e0233e7@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/SQOKp5zGpmdNshqqnMuy8uQJsh4>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Rats] I-D: draft-rundgren-cote-00
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 05:47:38 -0000

On 21. Jul 2022, at 07:09, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> As Carsten also pointed out, the CBOR WG has a bit of homework to do in order to create a robust repository of tags and associated (URL-based) definitions.

Well, the IANA registry for tags already is very robust (and already better than any purely URL-based mechanism).
Creating a document with “backups” (and a discussion of) specification references just improves that further.
Calling that “homework” is grossly misleading.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email