Re: [Cbor] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 30 September 2021 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785FA3A0AD6; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50Adin3xW8m8; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C173A09A1; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:218a:e90a:3666:76e7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6465B600008; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:28:00 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1633001280; bh=yGMxbI+CVTszmmkGMRNXRrhar37lqslgXI4QWTa28qM=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=YfxgrWht72Jv8TNVpopBqNo5AGR0Ce+p68x+KnrnzwiCRj8lhKJsC3q4nS4PcJO5i uKgO1WSW72f62I/4AdCF9unmXMdQrOqtNKn9edkfvrEQS/zMm9DhRO2slReFGzuvRM ox3qrqjw7y7DTJAMH/Wu12hsWE7wvq0gj0Fgp0dI=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <21C7DD47-DD0A-4B33-963D-1378B4EE339B@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18377E23-01AE-4D4F-9A29-D337A2D55F54"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:27:57 +0300
In-Reply-To: <163209269789.22340.15328778942438342106@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses.all@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <163209269789.22340.15328778942438342106@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 6465B600008.AE64E
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Seku5tja57TY-0JgmQ_7GHQjBFg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:28:34 -0000

Robert, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On 2021-9-20, at 2:04, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 2021-09-19
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-09-22
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
> 
> Should the IANA registry (and/or the document) say something more about what
> one can do if one wanted to represent an Ethernet address? 260 allowed that but
> you are deprecating it - are you only deprecating it for v4 and v6 use, or do
> you hope its use goes away completely?
> 
> 
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call