IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] 7049bis: Diagnostic notation gaps

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 11 September 2020 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBB93A0B67 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzYOI310jdnK for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EABA3A0B63 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.100] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bp904026rzyhD; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 00:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2455180.qK2NzYU5AI@tjmaciei-mobl1>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 00:09:23 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 621554963.595623-a199526973401dae90df9401fb685cd9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3D048670-A206-4758-89DD-C4CC4642041A@tzi.org>
References: <2766F4E6-0E67-472B-8BFA-75C529F4EE80@tzi.org> <1973898.N1gx0QA8IB@tjmaciei-mobl1> <2455180.qK2NzYU5AI@tjmaciei-mobl1>
To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/TR5NynKAvRsLJiZh3hJiUZOPfpo>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 7049bis: Diagnostic notation gaps
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:09:50 -0000

On 2020-09-11, at 23:47, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> By the way, should we explicitly allow hexadecimal floating point notation?

Yes:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8610#appendix-G.5

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email