IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Packed CBOR review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 17 June 2021 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5363A1B76 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiejHkvWBnwv for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBBA3A1B74 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G5KS25Ljkz2xHt; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:23:30 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <146F670A-48EA-4A90-B77C-4CCC535F1DB1@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:23:30 +0200
Cc: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 645621810.332564-939bcb916fa89f8aa82681d2508b202a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66266AD5-748E-4DAD-BA10-2D68C1C09DC5@tzi.org>
References: <8713C3AB-71C0-4EC0-8977-15F80EC11309@arm.com> <212CE7EA-73BC-47BF-B192-D2D523F4A376@tzi.org> <33C84949-0F9C-432C-9C94-DE2C9EE17976@arm.com> <3F367A6D-5CAD-474F-AFEE-DF1AC9A34135@tzi.org> <146F670A-48EA-4A90-B77C-4CCC535F1DB1@arm.com>
To: Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/U9gMWx3pJxz4vWdmS6gLk3GPYfU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Packed CBOR review
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:23:39 -0000

On 2021-06-17, at 13:17, Brendan Moran <Brendan.Moran@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Packed-CBOR-Dictionary = [ ?reference, [*shared], [*prefix], [*suffix]]
>> 
>> Probably.
>> Should that get a tag?
> 
> I don’t think it needs one, but feel free to convince me otherwise. Its use should always be explicit since it’s always known by a compressor or decompressor. It should always be in a map of reference/table pairs.

Actually, I think this should get a media-type, and appropriate content-format numbers (and then it would work with file-magic as well).

Grüße, Carsten

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status