[Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-02-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 October 2020 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73FC3A0844; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 09:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160191638517.8334.9714152306631467508@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:46:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/UPBbLKfyAeok4RO14GXNfMQnCFQ>
Subject: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-02-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:46:26 -0000

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-cbor-02-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cbor/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The paragraph "The CBOR working group will update RFC 7049 ..." feels like it
might now be out of date given that RFC 7049-bis is already in the RFC editor
queue.