Re: [Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-sequence-01: (with COMMENT)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 25 September 2019 12:33 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F7F120219; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JcHoL1mHPTJW; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B011200A3; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46dcsw1RL0z10hZ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:33:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <156828690765.16606.3643182853446961936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:33:23 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, cbor@ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, draft-ietf-cbor-sequence@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 591107601.677284-683711789195e3493dac4271524cb9f7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE223807-D588-4B9D-AFA8-D14C70AD9A55@tzi.org>
References: <156828690765.16606.3643182853446961936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/V7gxt1WNnlOpRJ8vtvPWmRLSt1A>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-sequence-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:33:28 -0000
Hi Éric, On Sep 12, 2019, at 13:15, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Carsten, > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I have one minor > COMMENT/suggestion and I am relying on the ART area directors for the > integration in the CBOR framework. > > Regards, > > -éric > > == COMMENTS == > > -- Section 2 -- > C.1) Unsure whether the "(Note that, ... valid JSON documents.)" is useful in > this document (I told you it is a minor comment). Based on the historical shape of JSON, it is still a widely held belief that JSON is self-delimiting (as apparently recently witnessed again in an application for an ALPN name for “the JSON protocol”). So I actually do think this parenthesis is useful, unless we cut out the whole observation about JSON not being self-delimiting. I would prefer to leave this in. Grüße, Carsten
- [Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-c… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ie… Carsten Bormann