Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-04.txt

otroan@employees.org Fri, 23 April 2021 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607AA3A180D; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vN2Rp9TvJypn; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D193A180C; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (unknown [91.239.252.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA0804E11A43; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:45:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE5356244B5; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: otroan@employees.org
Message-Id: <95B40318-7555-401E-9913-E1308723CB39@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F7E90BB-89C5-43B7-B24D-8BF8AA9F29C2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:45:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <29493.1619016767@localhost>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, 6man@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <161901652070.21189.10766815933127378426@ietfa.amsl.com> <29493.1619016767@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/VSSS8bvQeDtOgpadIZBIu8yXMCQ>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:45:52 -0000

Do you want to say anthing about tag 261 or perhaps subsume tag 261 into this?

Why do you have "Trailing zero bytes MUST be omitted." as it seems the decoder would happily deal with trailing zeros?

Cheers,
Ole

> On 21 Apr 2021, at 16:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> Title           : CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes
>> Author          : Michael Richardson
>> Filename        : draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-04.txt
>> Pages           : 6
>> Date            : 2021-04-21
> 
> ...
> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-04
> 
> The Designated Expert had already assigned the tags for -03, which was
> published March 25.
> Again, Carsten sent a few small edits, which are included in -04.
> 
> I am CC'ing 6man here, because perhaps someone there will have an opinion.
> 
> I believe that the document is done.
> I have running code.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>