IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] [COSE] CBOR magic number, file format and tags

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 23 January 2021 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447A83A0BD7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:39:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKdQk8-vSKmA for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:39:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997F83A0BD3 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7AE389A2; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:41:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DsyG_FZW9PeP; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:41:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9E8389A1; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:41:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51457A01; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:39:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, cbor@ietf.org, doug@ewellic.org
In-Reply-To: <DCCD03C2-8F1C-4AD4-A9B2-D58D2F3016E2@tzi.org>
References: <87wnw49wez.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <3DD6CB17-103F-48BF-A4EF-B2AEF1573C93@tzi.org> <30869.1611432082@localhost> <DCCD03C2-8F1C-4AD4-A9B2-D58D2F3016E2@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:39:24 -0500
Message-ID: <30257.1611437964@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/XZ2F3fRqWmHWvuRsq3N58kdo0KQ>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [COSE] CBOR magic number, file format and tags
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 21:39:30 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> 2) Two-element array.

    > Which is mostly a weird way to express a tag, without the need to
    > register it.  Why would this be better than a tag?  (Unless you believe
    > registering them is too onerous or creates too much noise in the
    > registry.)  So I’d prefer using tags, which otherwise have exactly the
    > same properties.  The 1+2+1+4 proposal looks pretty good to me.

It just avoids the CBOR Sequence.
The first element is something.  It can be a CBOR Tag<CBOR>.
The real item is second element.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email