[Cbor] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.txt
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 11 May 2026 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CCDEC92D38 for <cbor@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2026 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778517982; bh=tRidilc0q+92W0en7zEYTF56hqn85B5726Qs8qGvwog=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:To; b=DZij1nIwd5xnWhGho4hJteVSZKnDgzjDmedFQKi4RorQyApKuIp3dOR22DM9N0Tf2 yNu6my1e3tySTIqzcnFZM8F2/pVpp4OLN8Z/TzuMqCDb5Gk0cP6GKuaYrUHH2t0NBT wxG9NcQ3RSdoBAuOQc/qmPT/idci28C8GfEkl1Zs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tzi.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OsRYnBMkolkZ for <cbor@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2026 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CCFEEC92D27 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2026 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tzi.org; s=2019; t=1778517976; bh=tRidilc0q+92W0en7zEYTF56hqn85B5726Qs8qGvwog=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:To; b=lXS9MUfe0Taow5SK/p+lZlIUL0VZUzoBNrs9wgHsdZ2qA1UVXZhyM9mZ3xIYN7odl sGAkATV6s81moaKhEAzhQlNGWxqGIkfrNggf4rw/0reDzPxKsOe2IMdj2SSazTqdiH mREQnYK0REeRWmdcEMXv/eHn3tyjjBqBZjXsl+aoJptu1Km84BCVLqgkOQOMJfHrIU meaBINBov9a1kM11UYdqbFYJuQdA6LvZdh3ieC7u9J652dcHQYjSBdx5m+zzb9sHg+ /6BZgJLCvL74oTphOyCmBBzef+muHOyWoS9GeIoXnqSerV68zV/mFaiecaGe4oaXek 9QOoVJZ+YS+tg==
Received: from [192.168.217.132] (p548dcfc9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.207.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gDlwm5bsgzDCbj; Mon, 11 May 2026 18:46:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 18:46:16 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 800210776.231756-4284e7826251a93e6666dfce046f2418
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D50AB959-BE82-4B1D-9C05-0447E5BA50C3@tzi.org>
References: <177851749444.712850.1723479063465957058@dt-datatracker-54557f87b8-lnrkh>
To: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
X-FromAuthMilter: ok
Message-ID-Hash: CWHYHUW23SNPEUGIYEKLBQ36EQPROGKE
X-Message-ID-Hash: CWHYHUW23SNPEUGIYEKLBQ36EQPROGKE
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.txt
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Xjws_lrnpDwISOL5JqAiSSmYT6k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>
Paul just mentioned this announcement didn’t make it to the CBOR mailing list, so I’m forwarding. I messed up the editor’s note at the end of the abstract, which should say: // (This cref will be removed by the RFC editor:) The present -24 is // intended as reference material during the 2026-05-13 CBOR interim. // It completes the work started in PR #102 and adds a couple of // paragraphs on editorial conventions. It does not yet consider the // various proposals about updating the names given for this // specification and its instances. Grüße, Carsten Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.txt > Date: 2026-05-11 at 18:38:14 CEST > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > Cc: cbor@ietf.org > Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org > Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i-d-announce/MXSEL3PdRzDtRRI1DYyMSWcQ3Nc> > Message-Id: <177851749444.712850.1723479063465957058@dt-datatracker-54557f87b8-lnrkh> > > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.txt is now available. It is a > work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and > Extensions (CBOR) WG of the IETF. > > Title: CBOR Extended Diagnostic Notation (EDN) > Author: Carsten Bormann > Name: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.txt > Pages: 69 > Dates: 2026-05-11 > > Abstract: > > This document formalizes and consolidates the definition of the > Extended Diagnostic Notation (EDN) of the Concise Binary Object > Representation (CBOR), addressing implementer experience. > > Replacing EDN's previous informal descriptions, it updates RFC 8949, > obsoleting its Section 8, and RFC 8610, obsoleting its Appendix G. > > It also specifies registry-based extension points and uses them to > support text representations such as of epoch-based dates/times and > of IP addresses and prefixes. > > > // (This cref will be removed by the RFC editor:) The present -23 is > // intended as reference material during the 2026-04-29 CBOR interim, > // a complete specification that reacts to discussion on previous > // draft revisions and that can be used to confirm the results in a > // WGLC. Among other concerns, the discussion revealed that some > // additional editorial content was required; the attempt was to > // address this need without making technical changes. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-24 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list -- i-d-announce@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to i-d-announce-leave@ietf.org
- [Cbor] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-liter… Carsten Bormann