Re: [Cbor] Minutes posted for the CBOR session at IETF 111

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 02 August 2021 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF4B3A0958 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThicDnRlCkOw for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B92D33A0953 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id a26so34291578lfr.11 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5F8t6YQRtp0hGK4tV7KHBgDAwKUl0jDhb/AtuyjJlL8=; b=KZx9FhsfJK0/6IjwLnUb9FqhI9jmXtnvlj8iR3mKEY4ZpR9oTesNnHDivlW5ZLUAWw dyTEA440EGT2KS1f7IsFKJSWCXqS72quuF3dbhY5DkUdD6wjOfhG8dmXgprYGc6Mr+X8 3OmNRIEa8jzLws9KrwdplPjErdrTNzlaQ0viMZxMePvIfomrichyKyY6JEdAi+6Pqq6K 6KYSNovO8+luVYXRshPJnUwFebdFB0FToNkKbEVyLV7aJt3KpIXszVu9QWjrh0Iwab/y +EFAfRM1oA5gV6bUP9okiqqS1Z0AOA7GLnNLEk5wp79dvG62IT5rrbPYrLdlRkGUaotm 1QPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305KxQ1g+oyfMc+f6jTWzLpTG9JXJessB57gUlWFV2WNhGkRWmJ EzlOp5EI0JMbciHYWjIs/CFAWs2WeDA6j+r4U1A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzi672z5HduEdcAR0oKf8ziCgipLMJfWHF0ODFcNArdv2SGNzUFuUnZu7381w9AmU11zt9QwPZ+hYSiRt27ZQ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6d4:: with SMTP id u20mr5384573lff.643.1627917642627; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJK1mbyyWeUj_iFNrLZbRCLzhUO6eSNORHDgW1nQuOK3og@mail.gmail.com> <5C9BCBB9-A0B8-49E6-B30A-57C44639AEBF@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5C9BCBB9-A0B8-49E6-B30A-57C44639AEBF@tzi.org>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 11:20:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLUruup+-PZ7nTSo9dwWD8q+Mm2LJf9c3UR8Lgj8doRFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/YHce4WOaBH-j2gGcEqXXYpDaSAM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Minutes posted for the CBOR session at IETF 111
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:20:50 -0000

I don't think the note "together with" was intended to mean "in sync".
I think it was just meant to say that they're both moving forward, and
I intend to request publication of network-address today or tomorrow.

Barry

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:14 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-02, at 16:50, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/minutes-111-cbor-00
>
> Did we really say we want to move file-magic and network-address in sync?
> My brain tells me that we were ready to advance the latter (independent of the former, which thankfully now also has John’s review), but I haven’t watched the video.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor