Re: [Cbor] Charter update

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sat, 18 May 2019 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925212004F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0rLmvhLgCW8 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BE3120019 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:02:17 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: <cbor@ietf.org>
References: <032801d50c37$4b8a3120$e29e9360$@augustcellars.com> <9DD06B37-5EF4-40A1-B14D-C44D5F0C995A@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <9DD06B37-5EF4-40A1-B14D-C44D5F0C995A@tzi.org>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 16:02:13 -0700
Message-ID: <000a01d50dcd$bd0d2630$37277290$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHDadG055gE6jt6NF5RGd9M/3eUWgG4VcshpocE7qA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/_qIuZhUKmbw-89NBLN9dQDOpTg4>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Charter update
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 23:02:47 -0000

While the following work better?

There are a number of additional CBOR tagged types that are ...

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>;
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>;
> Cc: cbor@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Cbor] Charter update
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> thank you (the chairs) for taking this initiative.
> I still have to read the whole thing, but I already experience one heavy knee
> jerk:
> 
> > On May 17, 2019, at 00:32, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; wrote:
> >
> > extensions to CBOR types
> 
> I don’t think we should say that we are “extending” CBOR… Yes, we are
> exercising its extensibility points, but the result are new (or updated) CBOR
> Tags, not really extensions to CBOR itself.
> (I’m trying separate CBOR the standard from the greater CBOR ecosystem,
> which includes the Tag definitions.)
> 
> (We *are* extending CDDL.  I hope.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten