Re: [Cbor] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 30 September 2021 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41E53A0ADF for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BiYr1_qB1wr5 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDE33A0AD9 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcf6e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.207.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HKrrC1LbQz2xgd; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:39:39 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <d284d8db-35e9-9825-40ff-b318acf3b5b9@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:39:38 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 654694778.7556421-dbe08685ec8277987a542759e3077f85
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D222210E-7752-4750-BD85-A05E412E24F9@tzi.org>
References: <163209269789.22340.15328778942438342106@ietfa.amsl.com> <d284d8db-35e9-9825-40ff-b318acf3b5b9@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/a0p0fGJXxApmaByrRKwRtbUBL_w>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:39:47 -0000

On 2021-09-22, at 22:07, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> -IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54" to registrations 260 and 261
> +IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54 for IP addresses" to registrations 260 and 261

I’m still not sure that the WG can deprecate other peoples’ registrations, but ignoring that, I think that is a good resolution of the MAC address issue for now.

(Should we have thought about MAC addresses for this draft?  
Maybe…
But that is such a can of worms.)

Grüße, Carsten