From nobody Thu Sep 30 04:39:49 2021
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41E53A0ADF
 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id BiYr1_qB1wr5 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de
 [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDE33A0AD9
 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcf6e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [84.141.207.110])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4HKrrC1LbQz2xgd;
 Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:39:39 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <d284d8db-35e9-9825-40ff-b318acf3b5b9@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:39:38 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org,
 rjsparks@nostrum.com
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 654694778.7556421-dbe08685ec8277987a542759e3077f85
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D222210E-7752-4750-BD85-A05E412E24F9@tzi.org>
References: <163209269789.22340.15328778942438342106@ietfa.amsl.com>
 <d284d8db-35e9-9825-40ff-b318acf3b5b9@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/a0p0fGJXxApmaByrRKwRtbUBL_w>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Genart last call review of
 draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:39:47 -0000

On 2021-09-22, at 22:07, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> =
wrote:
>=20
> -IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54" =
to registrations 260 and 261
> +IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54 =
for IP addresses" to registrations 260 and 261

I=E2=80=99m still not sure that the WG can deprecate other peoples=E2=80=99=
 registrations, but ignoring that, I think that is a good resolution of =
the MAC address issue for now.

(Should we have thought about MAC addresses for this draft? =20
Maybe=E2=80=A6
But that is such a can of worms.)

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten