Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-02.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 09 June 2021 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4F03A18C9 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jb6MYkswRX9k for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419453A18CD for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G0TgV2zPhz2xJ2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:16:38 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <22908.1623247988@localhost>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:16:37 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644940997.897131-34d5f6168c60f0a7afdaddbabea5815f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1E6C96EC-53D4-4BBB-A88C-7B513D2B1D09@tzi.org>
References: <161530094514.13640.13557132723821236873@ietfa.amsl.com> <DE9E58FC-13DE-4AD5-B0EC-EBF0DC13153A@tzi.org> <22908.1623247988@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/c4B26IhD5OdzihDsWJwiyNo8IDM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-02.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:16:49 -0000

On 2021-06-09, at 16:13, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> I dont object.... but don't we need #include first :-)

I’m hacking something that would give us an

RFC8992.prefval

but in that specific case that was the variant I wanted to avoid :-)

Grüße, Carsten