Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 01 October 2019 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58F1120860; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFLhjURPZ6-C; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A817D1208B5; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.159.97.60] (ewa_guest_internet_sthlm_nat2.ericsson.net [192.176.1.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46jMhq6qxkzytB; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:53:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <BFDF4F74-582A-498B-970E-F8E36C68811C@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:53:31 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 591634408.71386-ccf49de27f731c21989cdbaae2538cd7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <921C0C9E-CDFC-481F-BCC5-9AB7DBD36425@tzi.org>
References: <156993848956.23703.4221075124549745771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BFDF4F74-582A-498B-970E-F8E36C68811C@tzi.org>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/c7ANOKoZT1wIzFoQPJdsCM9JEbw>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:53:36 -0000

On Oct 1, 2019, at 16:46, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> This is a historical reference which unfortunately no longer resolves.

With archive.org, it does:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110207024413/http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/

Should we go for that?

Grüße, Carsten