Re: [Cbor] Question about draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-08 abnf

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 22 May 2019 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E52120133; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHQ0YBiXMiC6; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B7912006A; Wed, 22 May 2019 07:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.106] (p54A6CC75.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.166.204.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 458Fg72hBczyVM; Wed, 22 May 2019 16:40:51 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FB915625-3F59-4FB0-87D2-297DC8C34D45@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 16:40:50 +0200
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-cddl@ietf.org, Daniel P <danielaparker@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 580228849.442553-ff3fa15a6f67ae208aba681c477e130c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F4CA526-496B-4B5F-861C-EA755A822ADA@tzi.org>
References: <CA+mwktJhp6=Opb8G8pBF=64Ye8_oEssOZp1UOgf_MiHoA6R=Yw@mail.gmail.com> <FB915625-3F59-4FB0-87D2-297DC8C34D45@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/dXCvyO4VNOIZ0gzGo5_zM_UvrPg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Question about draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-08 abnf
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:40:57 -0000

On May 17, 2019, at 23:11, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; wrote:
> 
> hexfloat = [“-"] "0x" 1*HEXDIG ["." 1*HEXDIG] “p" exponent

Daniel already confirmed off-list that he also thinks this fixes the bug.

I would like to bring this up briefly at the interim in 19 minutes so we can agree this should be fixed in AUTH48.

Grüße, Carsten