Re: [Cbor] changes in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 01 August 2021 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462FD3A15E6; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihp7fohWyy6x; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 997903A15E5; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id ds11-20020a17090b08cbb0290172f971883bso28822878pjb.1; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Jnm5ATjC4KMzKfxDX5DHFZgrJ61PqwsqxvL6fqnbJ8=; b=iPcnLIiJYRUyTFkvaL2gYnqAwtXq0YGlUCXrZ8ifU3AM8OfSlz6GdURTlXXuEE8bdf HQQXQfZSbbA+uY+wuzrVHBxxDmiDA35YQWf2YW1SXaRWRp3QLUuvMfmOlJIULj6WXamz MwEEJxPE0EEXqxX7hevIBaLeuNPcyDP2iAW5sr86oocke+kdl33Ch/kq9OeOdt4SESVB IptpAIEC1vtnYGJjP+l36yTLNMkadzi5RJpMkVs5mfNv2JZ72mnKxZ2OIfSUKG1XEPqc DKxsuiK1ChVSfmDyy602BEobBAIVI1RP+qG/0Qhw5hK+V3PX4xgowVI3FJDHW7XqusXW JRvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Jnm5ATjC4KMzKfxDX5DHFZgrJ61PqwsqxvL6fqnbJ8=; b=nyoXkgb+e9uATWcy75hR3ysVS38yskspapWAnkDNKn/eIUdABZMTyJbU4uINiY4lqN PcvYtjlpQvgETeLdV1fkfgv7L5iXESMh+UXGqJiN690XjGGUPHDgyCMeqrfOb+vf9chE /e+wlSUw+VMY8yv69QbPV5E7GvTcYLRBj5UR9b8D5f5Ck6jgu72G5kYwMI3r/dncRmSc YkJ5eysJ8AOMDbQ22Nl6/dIAqHvi41K0zSpN697RXeR5B8ETfHRzDJ5XRPqYPmtRZS1y IFzxFSDIQ1JWjcw9zfLisPz0LKNhKb+ZRnxby5ZLzyIsKHB0YE74dwEPYOgIPJ8/Kz/a MMLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302Ra2K/PX88OImAePp/92SLMOMmOlQH52j3pmsSAC4aknHFots 5pQZfiLFhd5lzSeNLDwsVErvggFlE4npZQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+5YGsFhHPslsyEmx4soi0+6FERidVQyZhF87vx2nsD8lLb6HaRo/Nj8ToksXcULrlxu+vVw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5059:: with SMTP id q25mr11225788pgl.9.1627857190238; Sun, 01 Aug 2021 15:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm9682667pfw.171.2021.08.01.15.33.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Aug 2021 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
References: <162608928922.11086.12172415971165753394@ietfa.amsl.com> <29067.1626090045@localhost> <CAMGpriUnfMjhk7teAN-A0j5SCK=BpyJEDC+NOCJtHzmF1BFeow@mail.gmail.com> <aa9884b5-fd58-60cb-fa1d-b2d76f5a09a1@gmail.com> <VI1PR07MB6256E2C9CC9565FF2F080B5DA0E89@VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <c2c7a576-e138-1364-5ed0-a2987c1c1974@gmail.com> <20210727210706.buavt5nwairrjblf@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <e889a219-26b2-2a2e-6d05-bb6c7db1f89d@gmail.com> <20210801113001.yksklfouoz6v4hvz@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <29415.1627850588@localhost> <46B16E2E-8461-4727-A6D4-5B008E279BB7@tzi.org> <24169.1627855941@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c4bf1541-2723-41de-a77a-3717cff6cb89@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 10:33:04 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24169.1627855941@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/elb1wJIufTUUeX4ADTtvbnjCzlg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] changes in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 22:33:17 -0000

One one point:
 
> how long will it be for the dust on RFC6874bis to settle?

That's out of our hands because it includes consulting with the browser community.

There's also the question of whether the name or the number is "canonical". As you'll have noticed, I don't like ambiguity on this point.

Regards
   Brian

On 02-Aug-21 10:12, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>     > More like 1981/1982...
>     > https://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/internet-history/2021-January/006916.html
> 
>     > Back to the subject: I’m happy with the tags in this specification
>     > being the equivalent of the YANG no-zone types.
> 
> okay, do you think this needs some text to explain this?
> 
>     > I’d rather wait for the dust on RFC6874bis to settle before putting in
>     > zones, and I still think CRIs (draft-ietf-core-href) are the place to
>     > do this.
> 
> how long will it be for the dust on RFC6874bis to settle?
> Should we ask for IESG review now?
> It seems that we could do this in parallel.
> 
>     > If we do put them in here (draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses), we 
need
>     > to put them into the address and the interface format; maybe not into
>     > the prefix format (but I’m not so sure about that).
> 
> Yes, you are right Address format too.
> I think we can revise (extend) the document to add what we need, once we
> understand the use cases better.
> 
> The only reason to stop is if we think we got something wrong.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>