Re: [Cbor] CBOR Interim: 2019-10-09

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 09 October 2019 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804DA12016E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28MEUAVHv-6W for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A1712011F for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46pFwS4Lbxz10hp; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:50:32 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <56A67D4F-7C91-4409-9C54-71D3B7594037@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:50:32 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 592321830.335585-3a124ec3f958088979e761e2a302404c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B054D731-2515-4BF1-B828-9C34AD25F2E6@tzi.org>
References: <CBFCB5E8-4634-4FB0-B056-78D6E115B600@ericsson.com> <56A67D4F-7C91-4409-9C54-71D3B7594037@tzi.org>
To: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/f01TNpP-k2dQngC_8sRiaYhsOyM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] CBOR Interim: 2019-10-09
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:50:38 -0000

On Oct 9, 2019, at 13:31, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> Instead of doing what I was supposed to do, I added a pull request

Two more:

* Remove the idea of strict mode. Discuss validity checking instead (#116)

* Explain how deterministic encoding is building on preferred serialization (#115)

https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/pulls

(CI still doesn’t work.  Hmm.)

Grüße, Carsten