IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: Consensus call on EDN literals single ABNF

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 25 July 2024 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6CFC1519A4 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHKxcCLCFBL3 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FACC1516EA for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5dc5d6c5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.197.214.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WVKnt3ftfzDCbg; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKoiRuZQMyLL0u=Q14k8z9djbk2F3w9Ans2u6JfDf=oGpPuC7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:55:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8361088C-9E22-4824-A100-98D85EE56170@tzi.org>
References: <ZpxlWGAC9UMLqd9c@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <CAN40gSudKn5NyD+5J5j59V1fvt2e+f_iAXO9FmmH6Mu8Q823RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoiRuZZ4UCjUwwUbVuM0_JqXefmrU23YG_3d-JmJEznh7ASQw@mail.gmail.com> <Zp1JaqTsOmD2lqd4@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <CAKoiRuZQMyLL0u=Q14k8z9djbk2F3w9Ans2u6JfDf=oGpPuC7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rohan Mahy <rohan.mahy@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: LKXH3JB7SZRFUQ6UIJZZE6A3G4SL3DBY
X-Message-ID-Hash: LKXH3JB7SZRFUQ6UIJZZE6A3G4SL3DBY
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: Consensus call on EDN literals single ABNF
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/fXnBDjAaFQxbIBHMmei147Y9Aww>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

On 24. Jul 2024, at 02:32, Rohan Mahy <rohan.mahy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It sounds like these ABNF are not getting much review at all. 

That used to be the case (*), but we do have better tools these days.

Grüße, Carsten

(*) Traditionally, in the best case, people checked just the ABNF syntax itself using bap…

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status