Return-Path: X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6CFC1519A4 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHKxcCLCFBL3 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2FACC1516EA for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5dc5d6c5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.197.214.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WVKnt3ftfzDCbg; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:55:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:55:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8361088C-9E22-4824-A100-98D85EE56170@tzi.org> References: To: Rohan Mahy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62) Message-ID-Hash: LKXH3JB7SZRFUQ6UIJZZE6A3G4SL3DBY X-Message-ID-Hash: LKXH3JB7SZRFUQ6UIJZZE6A3G4SL3DBY X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: =?utf-8?Q?Christian_Ams=C3=BCss?= , Ira McDonald , CBOR X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCbor=5D_Re=3A_Consensus_call_on_EDN_literals_single_ABNF?= List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 24. Jul 2024, at 02:32, Rohan Mahy wrote: >=20 > It sounds like these ABNF are not getting much review at all.=20 That used to be the case (*), but we do have better tools these days. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten (*) Traditionally, in the best case, people checked just the ABNF syntax = itself using bap=E2=80=A6