Re: [Cbor] Interim today 2021-02-24

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 24 February 2021 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891493A0FCA; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:12:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpL1FMl3h49S; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C4223A0FC7; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.152] (p5089a828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.168.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DlpYN1lc6zyhF; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:12:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <YDYIvs2+9ncPl43e@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:12:07 +0100
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FDCEF93D-4574-48DA-AD0A-228552B76A77@tzi.org>
References: <YDYIvs2+9ncPl43e@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?=22Christian_M=2E_Ams=C3=BCss=22?= <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/fo0Q_UijxuN67kOnPhIak_Y7h_s>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Interim today 2021-02-24
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:12:15 -0000

On 24. Feb 2021, at 09:05, Christian M. Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
> 
> If you have additional topics to table today, please let everyone know
> by responding here.

There is an update of the time-tag draft:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-time-tag-04.html

There is also the interesting discussion about respinning/extending RFC3339 that might feed into some aspects of this.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryzokuken-datetime-extended/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/ral4HWlVDw8mRRRmvMdSGPtGA0Y>
(He is saying “date format” but really means date/time.)

Grüße, Carsten