Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-network-addresses-05
Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Sat, 17 July 2021 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E863A1C0C for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYfZ0ZZKjgFv for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa07-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-09.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D36F93A1C0B for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([71.92.144.145]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 4pLQmVwZWOZDV4pLQmG3Xi; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:47:25 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=atV3tQVV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60f325bd a=E5cCtQzjhQJ5yJ7bKjC7Hg==:117 a=E5cCtQzjhQJ5yJ7bKjC7Hg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=5KLPUuaC_9wA:10 a=8qSefF8wAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=mFGxr6D31rhg2m0ZrYUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=gy0usrHT_YHxg8cEKwfj:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: lgl@island-resort.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK4-xQLpcaucyMb=w1b27X+VEwMQn-8ONawRJ4bJ=rWQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:47:23 -0700
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27961C0B-E089-4CD6-962B-76F65630A106@island-resort.com>
References: <YPGg6rnN6H3feUYx@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <CALaySJK4-xQLpcaucyMb=w1b27X+VEwMQn-8ONawRJ4bJ=rWQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfA3JEXS9tilzLCtFQ6jEy9pPX2chB8fVBua5aGOceXdjdBdy0Ayy4KoV3uCThLOEcWA45/GDmOESfl0MGNJY2EuAoF1M3Fvgk54ocQuCcZUcKtlVhHpH LPK3CpIYL1JwHpkG5EM2OvsOsFzPEJN9776RmJGcUErpevtTzxacf8rJ/Uch+ct/O+l83BemRhRpC34AAbw1Xx5Izh7X1NRdY8VQOzziSsW0SOH8SZ5qPgPg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/frtRl9duy0mk3k_XsgOcOkMZ-_U>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-network-addresses-05
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:47:31 -0000
Read it and it seems fine to me. I plan to add support for it to QCBOR, but due to other things on my list it will be a while. LL > On Jul 16, 2021, at 8:23 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > Hello CBOR group, > > This mail marks the start of a two week working group last call on > cbor-network-addresses[1], which will end at the CBOR meeting of > IETF111. > > While this document has been discussed during interims and on the > list, the number of participants discussing it so far is small. I'd > appreciate a few more reviews on this before we proceed with it. > > Everyone, please have a look at the latest version -- it's small, > just a few pages of actual content -- and post a review to the list. > Even, "I've reviewed it and it's ready to go," is useful. > > Thanks, > Barry > > [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses/ > > _______________________________________________ > CBOR mailing list > CBOR@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
- [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-fi… Christian Amsüss
- [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-ne… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Marco Tiloca
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… John Mattsson
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Christian Amsüss
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Christian Amsüss
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Christian Amsüss
- Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbo… Michael Richardson