IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: I-D Action: draft-mcnally-deterministic-cbor-10.html

Wolf McNally <wolf@wolfmcnally.com> Tue, 30 July 2024 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wolf@wolfmcnally.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B30DC16941C for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wolfmcnally-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DP9nxiNZItgv for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFC5C15152D for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70d25b5b6b0so3455481b3a.2 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wolfmcnally-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1722363108; x=1722967908; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fX7/B3c5Dr5MNnwKydC0JVg5TRNJDaeN+ZF84kUEXnw=; b=EozLuu9nZYWU6HNEa+hc9o3QO17/l+vykQOy0WSXJjcNg7B2iLRSwz/b+BrjCPF0xO 0Aji/hw7jGLggqXvQsjtQrzCMxV0fVexYg+c4+cJdwUDuMwuBCY4wjHQ2/Rb6/ZeTKfJ xa/XFhZ3RqF9RH5xTWIpIAAnB4qKglNZmbvwc5uR+0XOYK3e9rPqGnczHYVEfKMCT6co lIrgH5UDZi/yobE6ccCmLAbc7sTenyNUARoIP+ryqxCz4Qclx7HnxTjYtM5jPuUBQ0/W 2S8tv7GSI3cflDv339M5dIZ1tORF7GvViHo4xip0UoCRnWCNP8IH3glbhgLLorieMdrt 5G8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722363108; x=1722967908; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fX7/B3c5Dr5MNnwKydC0JVg5TRNJDaeN+ZF84kUEXnw=; b=jelMp+7NNbdpTdfSxIBH4LGh94eY0Hz9Lc1vtN7aaJyDrIRamxJZIGD/Qi9Re8vXwg AlEFaGEcslUCWyrQdT+9jGO2GCVBCUNC8kzuEAPFduq9i34Mx93fXBIqckbrZYx0nba5 moOom4WKjAWtHpiSz8XrgcJZjyhwsYnJSMwG9gvR0zeDpIerXW5KMB6v5i/blRpqw8Em eE8o99jXxfex5vW15qhJC1WcaPftnbiL2y7VfI116cVKw11mmWjd13tFCcpTH3gbUS/s IBlTbSIaGMtqfgGODBRlsm+dxz4WSISjqTJdBFS2NJ6oYB9P0LjjWtoBpV4z1iz1QTjP rBlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw3AyRTIQtAN5nA93MknBweWRerOpxwSEWaXLuk8cGl+hre6aYk FojlWaTjoH7mOlXiWtm5ejzqIvlhW1MwbV+a/240bShycleqqOcxxaQB8TNVuU4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFaTLihjvdYuPhPUp/+xnspwD4xIrA7NkVkxlbmOqViPEoD2N9JbgYSJnMrS87V+ktNxiDvg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b88:b0:70a:efd7:ada1 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70ecea3fd57mr10838334b3a.17.1722363107780; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([192.145.119.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-70ead6e15f9sm9065730b3a.18.2024.07.30.11.11.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
From: Wolf McNally <wolf@wolfmcnally.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a2b1212-200e-4c17-acdf-1278c4539531@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 11:11:34 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E36E0912-2FCC-436F-A87E-04511DD4033D@wolfmcnally.com>
References: <a962e326-ab3f-4857-a1ee-2042cf87f32a@gmail.com> <F3E4450A-EA4B-437E-9C58-5DB3972A152C@island-resort.com> <6601a16c-2b2e-45b2-b4e8-7bd4ba136401@gmail.com> <ea6a35e1-18a7-4bea-8ff8-5249e1f26b71@gmail.com> <CAEBC446-7730-4473-AC93-7908ADCB78B4@wolfmcnally.com> <5a2b1212-200e-4c17-acdf-1278c4539531@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: CORIOWZAYGU3HZGND2S2TDKE4NBZR32V
X-Message-ID-Hash: CORIOWZAYGU3HZGND2S2TDKE4NBZR32V
X-MailFrom: wolf@wolfmcnally.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, Christopher Allen <christophera@lifewithalacrity.com>, Shannon Appelcline <shannon.appelcline@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: I-D Action: draft-mcnally-deterministic-cbor-10.html
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/hG4iliYEHsr7Brp77PJSRd_fjVU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

Anders,

> On Jul 29, 2024, at 5:40 AM, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-07-29 10:08, Wolf McNally wrote:
>> Anders,
>> I don’t hear anyone here agreeing with you.
> 
> Hi Wolf,
> 
> You are 100% correct

Yes.

> but it might have an another explanation than you think: the "WG" (You, Carsten, Laurence, Joe, ?), is focusing on *Tool* developers*.
> 
> I obviously do not: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/PFZXSxyvQ7zG6Cj6QmzHd-_K52g/
> 
> However, targeting the bulk of *Application* developers, indeed makes interoperability the #1 concern.


I am a developer of specifications, tools, *and* applications.

So I’m going to need you to back up your speculation with some actual evidence.

~ Wolf

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status