IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 31 March 2025 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430E915269C7; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywYtFlt-yx9O; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6480F15269C2; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p548dc3ec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.195.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZRCSd5fGWzDCkk; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:00:17 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <721e2b78-9fa6-45d6-abbc-bb5936bf015d@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:00:17 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 765122417.117887-c1e2557f8a20b4c23ab67831321a713d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C28DF0E-29B6-4246-86A0-665CF30C2EA1@tzi.org>
References: <Z8oi3HMTum5eriSw@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <ABE85E99-9B1F-4B09-8910-9CEB58DA1240@tzi.org> <721e2b78-9fa6-45d6-abbc-bb5936bf015d@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Message-ID-Hash: POND7QPVJQYHOLEH4O2SV2QMJ6LI3ORE
X-Message-ID-Hash: POND7QPVJQYHOLEH4O2SV2QMJ6LI3ORE
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-cde@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/jC-Zst96Sz0faMJbVMXd10I_Ti8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

On 2025-03-31, at 14:57, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> We can WGLC cbor-cde anytime, personally, I stick to RFC8949.

Well, CDE sticks to RFC 8949 as well.

I don’t think you win anything by acting otherwise.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status