Re: [Cbor] Invalid tag (issue 176); notable tags draft

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 13 May 2020 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCDD3A0E09 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1nBCP6iTU4R for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CC83A0FB6 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 08:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p548DC699.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.198.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49Mf8n5LgHzyfm; Wed, 13 May 2020 17:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3364916.3PCeGIPBnu@tjmaciei-mobl1>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 17:43:37 +0200
Cc: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 611077416.958976-88643451d6a13189595b4aa2db828a5a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C6E1F8CE-E116-44C8-A3B9-B21C99E01204@tzi.org>
References: <9B6B7286-F934-4576-86E4-D8654293A9FC@tzi.org> <3461942.bKgpO4XBJ3@tjmaciei-mobl1> <54D2E6E4-DF68-4E21-8418-D7EAE6768315@tzi.org> <3364916.3PCeGIPBnu@tjmaciei-mobl1>
To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/jz9MKQi3Urrt8wBqd3vn1sQtKzU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Invalid tag (issue 176); notable tags draft
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:43:47 -0000

On 2020-05-13, at 17:41, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> Then reserve 0xffff, 0xffffffff and 0xffffffffffffffff.

Makes sense to me.  Any opposing views?

Grüße, Carsten