Re: [Cbor] my (WGLC re-)views on error processing in RFC7049bis and future-proofing

Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@chromium.org> Thu, 21 May 2020 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jyasskin@google.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35C23A0ABE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JJ3n1G6qCSf for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 942BA3A0A9B for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id m44so6155017qtm.8 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g1kK94+t8MiBOEilxQ4cZGsYLR57S7POrHjiDmmvcOs=; b=VFksscrMjkyYYGg95f0Xgmx9w5MhyInORmMzZ5p5U2IMJA/xGpa1wObzfwe6P8D4nv yZD3GrKd9KM6IesXhuIQ2LyGMGcEMmHLZZ6LZXZAiRSbztoBE0byVsZsRGzv6SOrBKFw QjSfjWH0NNUycM/BAyKpXCNoqBVp5bk2Za3zU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g1kK94+t8MiBOEilxQ4cZGsYLR57S7POrHjiDmmvcOs=; b=XUYWO63+kSACfzrZsSngGMPCGq49jbERG9mJaGSIL/0eM/8flJ3zKqEFg841h/kUKg lKVc8jcDZxqgU6CtckQn7p4/cDxIebZ6SjdRfxs3/YsLLMC4h9FEss7Hq26dQ+cfZOHO WBCR2uOpl/Dfrj3hN8/lQT81xja1Vr8HxsAsKTVYG9uELwpr+LagMRRTV+akIfvqfUzf lIrAcc61A1o/mHIhPRXe2AtpJa8u4wPqTUkntC+ChKKK0ettcTvzG6DHFbehpriqD9a7 oZPxF/+/u4ErdaZ/co0yVB0xjAambcdxbMsamGxUnPc7c3squtwYD4ZgLdSpn8njMFAh QIag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AK2atUj5RJEmaygCgTZ+/0+riR/MjzqfvGJnSCs942CG91+dW AHMVMcvFECRhyjRbT877uyIdEe8LpXphjELU/KB5M5UX/9E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAmwEqdArt/Hm5nCYIdaUFxZtACuvCWK0vepedV4kZubHU/7BMFl/rRbWcYEE/85b+y1+NtSUxNOUT99EFhv4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2679:: with SMTP id v54mr11570015qtv.130.1590083121082; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <17300.1588779159@localhost> <38BB6FFF-737F-4C11-AD7A-DA3F28A9F570@tzi.org> <CANh-dXkdjMyO=WFUxrF06OfP+RE9v11unKJXL8P3UtEe+prV1w@mail.gmail.com> <13690.1588894939@localhost> <CANh-dXmjD=RCwh7ExjSvFx+5ciew+eqHoVS88OommQ2xVnX5=Q@mail.gmail.com> <2963.1589473899@localhost> <377E8232-0638-419F-8D79-710F42C2B4E3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <377E8232-0638-419F-8D79-710F42C2B4E3@tzi.org>
From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:45:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CANh-dX=gs4XKobJhDgBp5KDF-93TZUO5Hgh=F-OK=zOFCeXx_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098e05e05a62c139f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/kUTcO3OCCb18LOBQTbr5CjjBuNs>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] my (WGLC re-)views on error processing in RFC7049bis and future-proofing
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 17:45:24 -0000

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:50 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> >  "A string containing an invalid UTF-8 sequence is well-
> >   formed but invalid."
> >
> > I think that this might need clarification.
>
> Not for a pedantic like me who has already memorized the content of
> Section 1.2…


Quick note that I've added a citation to section 1.2 in
https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/191, which Paul rapidly merged. :)

Jeffrey