Re: [Cbor] Chair review of cbor-file-magic 08

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

> 
> Speaking of the registry: The shepherd writeup form makes a point of
> asking that the used registry be identified, and 'Concise Binary Object
> Representation (CBOR) Tags' doe snot show up once in the IANA
> considerations. (It talks of 'registering CBOR tags', which is obvious
> to us with the context, but not necessarily to an editor who does not
> have all the lists indexed by abbreviations).

Yes, I normally do a full reference to a registry (and have one to IANA.core-parameters); no idea why this isn’t in here.

The full kramdown-rfc liturgy:

Registry {{cbor-tags (CBOR Tags)<IANA.cbor-tags}} of {{!IANA.cbor-tags}}

(I need to invent special syntax for that…)

The registry (sometimes called subregistry (*)) is actually called “CBOR Tags”, btw.; but the web page that combines the registries (sometimes called registry) is called “Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags”.

https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags/cbor-tags.xhtml#cbor-tags

Grüße, Carsten

(*) No, I don’t know why RFC 8126 didn’t nail down one consistent terminology here.