Re: [Cbor] Interims resuming 2021-04-07, agenda (endianness, 128bit, freezer)

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

> The agenda is updated at [1]; so far it contains points that we ran out
> of time for in IETF110 (cddl-freezer and 128bit extensions), and the
> recent endianness discussions (which share the theme of "things outside
> compatibility with the first versions of CBOR").
> 
> Please let me know if there are other things you'd like to put on the
> agenda.

I’m not sure we discussed this one yet in detail:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/16aiDEBhJj3kipj_7PVppEhxAr5E6QhQreN61eCxvBjU/edit#

This is a (cbor-tags) registration request, so the WG does not have to have an opinion, but the designated expert would be interested in it nonetheless.
(I’m personally pretty convinced of the use case; this is more of an issue of keeping tabs on available tag numbers and looking out for related use cases.)

Grüße, Carsten

> See you there
> Christian
> 
> [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-interim-2021-cbor-06-cbor-01/
> 
> -- 
> To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
>  -- Bene Gesserit axiom
> 
>