Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sun, 30 June 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255371201AF; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JU_eW2_2nJ98; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419D212019B; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:03:50 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, <cbor@ietf.org>
References: <156164124047.21323.7390079965019244513.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156164124047.21323.7390079965019244513.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 13:03:49 -0700
Message-ID: <0e9501d52f7e$f09d67d0$d1d83770$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKMAaInjJKYun2fr3m3NZTZF1ZhdqVG+niQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/lfheiW79eMWXhKlfcNvFrBT67GE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:04:04 -0000


-----Original Message-----
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 6:14 AM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: cbor-chairs@ietf.org; cbor@ietf.org
Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-cbor-01-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cbor/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Mirja's second DISCUSS item.  I'd add to it that the distinction between "Internet-wide" and "Narrow purpose" is also not clear to me.  In particular, I'm not sure why "Narrow purpose" couldn't also be published through the ISE.

[JLS] In my mind the ISE is a different forum.  I do not consider the IETF and the ISE to be the same things.