Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic: Processing recommendations

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 02 June 2021 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E803A41BF; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJLzhADguZsS; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DA23A41E4; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fw7yD5PP5z2xg2; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D11722B-D0A5-4439-9E78-A6FCD967FD55@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:44:20 +0200
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 644330660.429095-677731aa734ab005e96c4004c3fb8f8c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <079802F8-80DB-44BC-87FF-06F0E476C096@tzi.org>
References: <YIBBjy5wuep9yd+M@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <2D11722B-D0A5-4439-9E78-A6FCD967FD55@tzi.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Christian_Ams=C3=BCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/m6q60Q1VMVxjwDYxTy-TN6rkpHM>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic: Processing recommendations
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:44:32 -0000

On 2021-04-21, at 22:23, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2021-04-21, at 17:15, Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
>> 
>> (On the mapping between content formats and tags I'll have to revisit
>> the discussion history; I was under the impression that at some point
>> this was tied to content format numbers, as in "registering 2**16 tags
>> at once", but seems I was mistaken here).
> 
> I still like the idea.

… and I wrote this up.

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-tag-coap-content-format-00.html

Do we want this?

This is a bit below the minimum publishable unit :-)

Move it to notable-tags?  To file-magic?

Grüße, Carsten