Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 10 September 2020 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9253A0ABA; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-EUelnqtOEd; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB213A0AB6; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BnL922G6MzywN; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:59:18 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR00MB0682D8C241D26AB6EA6D6D64F5271@DM6PR00MB0682.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:59:17 +0200
Cc: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "barryleiba@computer.org" <barryleiba@computer.org>, "draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org>, "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "francesca.palombini@ericsson.com" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 621439157.794111-d268eb11b80a6a51438b57b4363822bc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C96CB11F-EA67-40E2-BE73-23A5F6FC2373@tzi.org>
References: <159912383150.30053.12358343264824826318@ietfa.amsl.com> <566723EF-5D64-4E0A-87DA-037E3654A06A@tzi.org> <MN2PR11MB4366BA81C4F8989A63CAE78DB52C0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DM6PR00MB0682D8C241D26AB6EA6D6D64F5271@DM6PR00MB0682.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/oKhDnmbTbGa5QRXsJ5SubLmWAjg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:59:24 -0000

On 2020-09-10, at 15:33, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> On the "unsigned or negative" comment, I followed what Carsten Bormann told me was prevailing CBOR terminology usage.  But if the IESG wants me to change the text in the introduction to "positive, zero, or negative", I'm open to that as well.

… and I would be strongly opposed.

Grüße, Carsten