Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-02.txt

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

Time-tag-02 fills in proposals for all the TBDs that were outstanding in the text.
This version is intended by the authors as ready for working-group last call, synchronized with a WGLC of the IXDTF specification in SEDATE.

The diff should be quite self-explanatory (and is, except maybe for the IANA tables, quite bite-sized):
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-02


I have proposed this update for discussion at the CBOR interim tomorrow.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2022-10-04, at 23:54, [e-mail] wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Time, Duration, and Period
>        Authors         : Carsten Bormann
>                          Ben Gamari
>                          Henk Birkholz
>  Filename        : draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-02.txt
>  Pages           : 17
>  Date            : 2022-10-04
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC 8949) is a data
>   format whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small
>   code size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the
>   need for version negotiation.
> 
>   In CBOR, one point of extensibility is the definition of CBOR tags.
>   RFC 8949 defines two tags for time: CBOR tag 0 (RFC3339 time as a
>   string) and tag 1 (Posix time as int or float).  Since then,
>   additional requirements have become known.  The present document
>   defines a CBOR tag for time that allows a more elaborate
>   representation of time, as well as related CBOR tags for duration and
>   time period.  It is intended as the reference document for the IANA
>   registration of the CBOR tags defined.
> 
> 
>   // The present version (-02) fills in proposals for all TBDs that
>   // were outstanding.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-02.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-02