Re: [Cbor] Deprecating tags and Ethernet address in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 06 October 2021 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E76D3A1C90; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJV88Et8eySl; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446EF3A1C95; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9F5182DC; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id c5dW0Jw2KXSv; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5892718068; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286AC614; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
cc: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, cbor-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEEF3Rv=KoiS9DZZUVeXnLPdhT=1qa-CNwJR-CHtk9BhEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <163344085669.17315.998599560097016034@ietfa.amsl.com> <26566.1633453159@localhost> <CAF4+nEEF3Rv=KoiS9DZZUVeXnLPdhT=1qa-CNwJR-CHtk9BhEg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:25:18 -0400
Message-ID: <6298.1633530318@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/oaMqUcMzWNcu5gm0aizxcd7T7FU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Deprecating tags and Ethernet address in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:25:33 -0000

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I am in the process of revising RFC 7042. See
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-rfc7042bis/

    > Perhaps rfc7042bis should specify a CBOR tag for MAC addresses. I'd be
    > happy to add that.

I think that this is the best result.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide