Re: [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-11: (with COMMENT)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 April 2022 12:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A68B3A1270; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ls-9FlJdbgMn; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59BD3A1269; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.152]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0687E1F456; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:59:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id B8CD71A049D; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:59:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, christian@amsuess.com, cbor@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <165044403005.9373.3182771372557501317@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <165044403005.9373.3182771372557501317@ietfa.amsl.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> message dated "Wed, 20 Apr 2022 01:40:30 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 08:59:01 -0400
Message-ID: <792342.1650459541@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/pS8_2D-lPQsQUfp3-cja3UNphpQ>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:59:19 -0000
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > - Speaking very frankly I feel like section 3.1 and section 3.2 are not > the center part of this specification and should be moved to appendix > section. (to save others from looking this up: 3. Advice to Protocol Developers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1. Is the on-wire format new? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2. Can many items be trivially concatenated? . . . . . . . . 9 3.3. Are there tags at the start? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ) That could be done: it could go into an appendix. We added this section at the request of early reviewers. It seems to me that the section would get lost there. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draf… Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
- Re: [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on … Michael Richardson
- Re: [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on … Zaheduzzaman Sarker