IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-04.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 18 January 2023 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2279C15153F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:02:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nFONoUAtrhPe for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAF2C14F72D for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 14:02:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Ny09t5nWPzDCbs; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:02:42 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAM70yxBbNtn0D91tZ1mSY3Cg-MMVnpaCodius5MWH-wEjQHu-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:02:42 +0100
Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadimnuclight@gmail.com>, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 695772162.36042-fe1bc91f1f9c66d54e482c45efab51db
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5EFA83F3-7FD3-4B11-A23A-8D98E59542AB@tzi.org>
References: <167345627851.15097.9738487459393843034@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAM70yxD2Z52JsJ=XHFFrJWFuAEG5oHv-B8gf6zRYVK4fhpDpeQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B9B7A5E-D61E-4B97-9CE5-9A8AE7055F50@tzi.org> <20230117004326.5642c6ab@nuclight> <CAM70yxAs=9S-H6ve2HfDf5W=f4cKGZ3B=AXJV==vm26ERs9-mg@mail.gmail.com> <20230117204606.2b742f14@nuclight> <CAM70yxAeLGmiPyidn1zc64rjRcKNHp7hSUt+d6veH-AqguObkw@mail.gmail.com> <20230117220443.6c5054e7@nuclight> <CAM70yxBbNtn0D91tZ1mSY3Cg-MMVnpaCodius5MWH-wEjQHu-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Emile Cormier <emile.cormier.jr@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/qXQDsEnldk2N5seUwKoLu3EOoao>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-time-tag-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:02:48 -0000

On 2023-01-17, at 21:26, Emile Cormier <emile.cormier.jr@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm not an expert on time synchronization, so I cannot propose a resolution and numeric format of the Uncertainty and Guarantee attributes. One possibility would be:
> 
> [quantity, exponent]

This is what key 4 (base 10) and key 5 (base 2) already do.
Putting in a tag 1002 duration into the uncertainty/guarantee values gives us access to these formulations.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status