Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949
Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Sat, 06 May 2023 09:50 UTC
Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A94C151700 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 02:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6SutRDcZ2JzI for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 May 2023 02:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E362C14CF18 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 May 2023 02:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f415a9015bso7124005e9.2 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 May 2023 02:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683366631; x=1685958631; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d8JKlhnEfp0cdsql4FS5CeZGaf3bqMVrSbhuKrw1hBE=; b=W4YPoxGpWy9ZjzHKx2LyzSd89gTMv1vNi+6stobAHeaCNUmA7ClvFjnBiZW+JC9AXh RLusDg6/CUN9Ru0oros9zpsxI5BdRkeY1Z+Sx/a6alH7jVUlM5bqDzP5ek3VnyZs7Ytj peCO0E1G9uGRL0Mo/eLsE1/pVGkHdRwAd86EDdlLTkRNI4Li0Iio/fukx6DEdybclMOI tXXHbfub14WCubQQzjC5UD7+RQMTLzsvLLweIuamRFCdXUIDDJpJbh9e2JZSC7AVKTeG GFea8y/9Li7eVq+WsHjwyw+4antrqLwXQvLGOTqLL6FTgUFJSJKKHTA0IMuA/Lbf26zf f4Ag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683366631; x=1685958631; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d8JKlhnEfp0cdsql4FS5CeZGaf3bqMVrSbhuKrw1hBE=; b=GwT6sOlcJSlTcKZHIxh5NCZIM30cCVd0DfsXbRZ15VRMBwoL4DwAh329cIGVcjrdSk 1PS40d85yBoznE8bUEYYKbW0sn6WLnJamD0Aaq2wDeve8mno1y71kf9AQB3Jf3i/N1DX w3FUcyrxz8A1DZS6HBED8rDRGXvXmOGu+OamzlV0MyJ3GoF6BAIaZ42cBlPeEnrRBwme W+v11PJofmslcCHvAFiC3VfUUIAaU+tmQS01t4hlRn+GwujlYRXpmDcQhiSJfuz/jH0m CWtqk2oJQr2FHPjJCcozHiPkkn23WypcnmhWKbCjPbyGFfgxGTM6H38dHVF0C2AG7cuR y/2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyBWCV49nufL+LACokD5pd7VXtuSHU9ixWNZno8dFPXs58yAeJ9 u5it5AxMAekOcDKUYMPrtm1/VvQf64w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4bQ2YAcJA2JNlvNjO6MWLPyiwQLq6uu0c03WpOlbdhD+wHHUYDyhC7qPAxEnsH64QoU3f6LA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:124d:b0:307:8800:bbdd with SMTP id j13-20020a056000124d00b003078800bbddmr984703wrx.64.1683366630746; Sat, 06 May 2023 02:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2a01:e34:ec4e:5670:1cdc:b50f:25e4:2cbd? ([2a01:e34:ec4e:5670:1cdc:b50f:25e4:2cbd]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m2-20020a056000008200b0030630120e56sm4855228wrx.57.2023.05.06.02.50.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 May 2023 02:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <344bda2a-9c99-24b4-1a15-268f0d826d44@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 11:50:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>
References: <8233a692-df84-f093-96bf-fe99c03adfc5@gmail.com> <31111796-3CF7-4F8F-A805-4CBE1124E9D8@tzi.org> <e16961f5-edbc-233e-3e24-e3a20bc57ea4@gmail.com> <83052D85-36BE-45AA-81EA-A46068B89D95@tzi.org>
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <83052D85-36BE-45AA-81EA-A46068B89D95@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/qbNkvUKTzmb_G3XwUEz4-PnWP0I>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2023 09:50:37 -0000
On 2023-05-05 9:43, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2023-05-05, at 09:27, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> >> The target for an interoperability profile are the 80-90% of all developers working with enterprise systems as well as open standards for banking and similar. > > The point here is “an interoperability profile”. > You could define many, and defining one for fintech etc. is fine — it just isn’t a “CBOR interoperability profile”, but a “how is our specific set of applications going to use CBOR” profile. This quest is by no means limited to a specific sector, it is intended to be an integral part of platforms like Open API, Java, C#, Python, Node, and lo and behold, Web browsers! For the latter I would be more than happy together with You, sketching up a suitable JavaScript API for possible submission to ECMA. I have no particular name preferences. Hälsningar (Grüße is Swedish), Anders
- [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [Cbor] Status of Appendix A in RFC 8949 Anders Rundgren