Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 01 October 2019 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BC212012C; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SD941FabJnlb; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E6E120089; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x91NK6iE005837; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 19:20:06 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x91NK6iE005837
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1569972007; bh=wAxAp6lDtpo8Tj87RgAKOHX6B6kO42vW7nam7ZhxjdA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BcMAjDLTwjMoqp4Eb0tb29CA47SCdYjqSIVXvrjYFgLSHjn2VVWcQ3G0Yu/fwDRXR 1RVzSc7ss97I5um5JOampcyivnvNhB7YY5pS5Gu5JiHZ7gD6IShaaQQDrC7XFJHLwq uWFDtdiQQ9x5UtXpMHKOCbnvPzx19uLUhDvGzsmg=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x91NK3rk015894; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 19:20:03 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 19:20:03 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Francesca Palombini" <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "cbor-chairs@ietf.org" <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVeGDcbEof+UpaLkWVGF16AwG1KadGIGaAgAAB4YCAAI2FAA==
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 23:20:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CEB91210-6AB1-414E-9432-57C7D005024A@cert.org>
References: <921C0C9E-CDFC-481F-BCC5-9AB7DBD36425@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <921C0C9E-CDFC-481F-BCC5-9AB7DBD36425@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7BA24C7412B173479C09DC02B227BC35@sei.cmu.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/qhNGhpiTJyN39WrBVXMpzw8nY3Q>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 23:20:14 -0000

Hi Carsten!

> On Oct 1, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 16:46, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This is a historical reference which unfortunately no longer resolves.
> 
> With archive.org, it does:
> 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20110207024413/http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/
> 
> Should we go for that?

That would work for me. It’s an informative reference so I don’t see an issue.

Thanks for tracking it down.

Roman

> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>